Cases 11 - 20 of 140
Kaltman v. Kaltman et al
as 8:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Brian Kaltman and Bryan Kaltman
Defendant:
Robert Kaltman, Lynne Kaltman and Belyn Key LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Colahar v. Lazarte et al
as 8:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jan'e Colahar
Defendant:
Jose Lazarte, Thomas J Wilson, Bryan Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Foster v. Corizon Medical et al
as 1:2022cv02159
Plaintiff:
Bryan Ernest Foster
Defendant:
Corizon Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Chirico v. Shaw Electric, LLC
as 8:2022cv02072
Plaintiff:
Bryan Chirico
Defendant:
Shaw Electric, LLC and George Allan Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sheppard v. Gavikin et al
as 1:2022cv00951
Plaintiff:
Bryan Sheppard
Defendant:
Officer Gavikin and Officer S. Eigbokhan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carey v. Baltimore County et al
as 1:2022cv00782
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Carey
Defendant:
Md Baltimore County, Melissa Hyatt, Emily Wolford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00489
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hardman v. Bobren
as 1:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Bryan Anthony Hardman
Defendant:
Jose Bobren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Cecil County Detention Center et al
as 1:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Bryan Ernest Foster
Defendant:
Cecil County Detention Center, Elkton Police Department, Cecil County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
