Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 7,141
WALTERS v. DIEHL et al
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER WALTERS
Defendant: BRYAN DIEHL, PATTON BORROW POLICE and PATTON BORROW EMT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRACKEN v. SOCKEL
as 5:2024cv00210
Plaintiff: JAYLYNN MCCRACKEN
Defendant: BRYAN SOCKEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DINGLE v. TOMMAGE
as 2:2023cv05178
Plaintiff: BRYAN DINGLE
Defendant: MAJOR TOMMAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWERS v. WEBB et al
as 2:2023cv04679
Plaintiff: RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS
Defendant: JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MASSAQUOI v. ODDO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00280
Plaintiff: MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant: LEONARD J. ODDO, C. Glass, Vicki Vaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LeBOON et al v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2023cv04391
Plaintiff: PETER LeBOON and PATRICIA LeBOON
Defendant: BRYAN WILLIAMS, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04377
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04222
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BOWLING v. KLINE et al
as 2:2023cv01800
Plaintiff: COLBY MATTHEW BOWLING
Defendant: WARDEN BRYAN KLINE, DEPUTY WARDEN STEVEN PELESKY, SERGEANT RHONDA CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
West Shore Home, LLC v. Chapman
as 1:2023cv01669
Plaintiff: West Shore Home, LLC
Defendant: Bryan Chapman

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?