Cases 11 - 20 of 320
Butler v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
Michael Butler
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Butler v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Tommie Butler
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
USA Farm Labor, Inc. v. Su, et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
USA Farm Labor, Inc., JCP Farms, LLC, Lazy BS Bar, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Julie Su, Brent Parton and Brian Pasternak
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Butler v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2023ct03108
Plaintiff:
Reginald L. Butler
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Nancy Butler
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
In Re: Gardasil Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2022md03036
Plaintiff:
Jessica Raymer, Payton Bergin, Kameron Hilton and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp., Watchung Pediatrics and others
Cross Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wendt et al v. Bullard et al
as 5:2023ct03047
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Samuel Clement Wendt, Brandon S. Goins and others
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Mark Barnhill, NC Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. USA
as 1:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
CRAIG LAMONT BUTLER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SADE v. SP BUTLER SOLAR LLC
as 1:2022cv01113
Plaintiff:
ROVSHAN SADE
Defendant:
SP BUTLER SOLAR LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Butler v. Cherry et al
as 5:2022ct03446
Plaintiff:
Dominique Jamil Butler
Defendant:
Officer Cherry, Officer Demeri, Officer Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
