Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GREEN v. KRASNER et al
as 2:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE GREEN
Defendant:
LARRY KRASNER, JACQUELINE C. ROMERO, JUDGE MOSS BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. P/O SEDLER #7592 et al
as 2:2023cv02632
Petitioner:
TERRANCE GREEN
Respondent:
P/O SEDLER #7592, JUDGE MOSS, LARRY KRASNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BROOKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv02222
Plaintiff:
ANDRE R. BROOKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JACQUELINE C. ROMERO and STEVEN M. DETTELBACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) O'Connor v. Romero
as 2:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Glenn O'Connor
Defendant:
C. Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GEDEON v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2023cv01600
Plaintiff:
PASCAL GEDEON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, U.S. DISTRICT ATTORNEY, VERIZON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
