Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Braxton v. Wright et al
as 1:2013cv01372
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Braxton
Defendant:
Lt. Wright, Lt. Williams and Major Darden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poteat v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 3:2012cv00843
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Poteat
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Penry v. Wilson et al
as 1:2012cv01081
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Penry
Defendant:
Eric Wilson, Stone, Weisman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winslow v. Department of Human Services
as 2:2012cv00265
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Winslow, II
Defendant:
Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Treppel v. Reason, et al
as 2:2011cv00384
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Treppel
Defendant:
J. Paul Reason , David R. Goode , Michael D. Lockhart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes v. Harrell Contracting, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00438
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Barnes
Defendant:
Harrell Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bacon et al v. Stiefel Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 3:2011mc00003
Plaintiff:
James A. Bacon, Mark Palakovich and Marion Burk
Defendant:
Stiefel Laboratories, Inc. , Charles W. Stiefel, Brent D. Stiefel and others
Witt v. Herrick et al
as 1:2010cv01164
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Witt
Defendant:
Stephen M. Herrick, Chaundry, Chad Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles W. Ross Builder, Inc. v. Olsen Fine Home Building, LLC et al
as 4:2010cv00129
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Ross Builder, Inc.
Defendant:
Olsen Fine Home Building, LLC, Beverly Olsen, Boathouse Creek Graphics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Simmons v. Callahan et al
as 1:2010cv00814
Plaintiff:
Christopher S. Simmons
Defendant:
Charles W. Callahan and Eduardo T. Moten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
