Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Davis v. Thompson et al
as 2:2014cv20467
Plaintiff:
Markus Levar Davis
Defendant:
J. M. Thompson , Stover , Keeney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gravely v. City of Charleston et al
as 2:2013cv04209
Plaintiff:
Richard Gravely
Defendant:
City of Charleston , City of Charleston Police Department, Christopher St. Claire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison et al v. Burford et al
as 2:2011cv00700
Plaintiff:
Patricia Harrison and Brian Good
Defendant:
Christopher Burford , Owen Morris , Thomas Ranson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tofi v. Napier, et al
as 2:2010cv01121
Plaintiff:
John C. Tofi
Defendant:
S. M. Napier, R. G. Henderson, The City of Charleston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youngblood v. Charleston Police Department
as 2:2009cv00083
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel James Youngblood, Jr.
Defendant:
Charleston Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Simpson v. Charleston Police Department et al
as 2:2009cv00021
Plaintiff:
Cory Anthony Simpson
Defendant:
Charleston Police Department and Unknown Charleston Police Officers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Youngblood, Jr. v. Charleston Police Department
as 3:2009cv00002
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel James Youngblood, Jr.
Defendant:
Charleston Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Murdock v. Higginbotham et al
as 2:2008cv01054
Plaintiff:
Daniel Murdock
Defendant:
Ryan Higginbotham, Mark Petty, Justin Doughty and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Myers v. Dickinson et al.
as 2:2008cv00323
Plaintiff:
Adam P. Myers
Defendant:
C. A. Dickinson, D. O. Nikocevic, N. A. Null and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williamson v. Randall et al
as 2:2007cv00572
Plaintiff:
Andre Williamson
Defendant:
Randall, Palmer, Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
