Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Johnson v. Malprass et al
as 1:2021cv06435
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
David Malprass, American Med Association, Queen Elizabeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JOHNSON, JR. v. REV. MOODY et al
as 2:2021cv19426
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
REV. MOODY, JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR., DONALD J. TRUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Berkshire Hathaway et al
as 1:2021cv05230
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Berkshire Hathaway, CDC and Queen Elizabeth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarence D Johnson v. Biden et al
as 2:2021cv07914
Plaintiff:
Clarence D Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Biden, Trump, Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Malprass et al
as 3:2021cv00561
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
David Malprass, World Bank CDC, Queen Elizabeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. Berkshire Hathaway et al
as 3:2021cv00559
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Berkshire Hathaway, CDC and Queen Elizabeth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Duke University Hospital NC et al
as 2:2021cv01751
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Duke University Hospital NC, CDC Government, United Nations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Byers et al
as 1:2021cv23371
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Angela Byers, Queen Elizabeth, Janet Woodlock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clarence Johnson, Jr. v. CDC Gov, et al
as 21-12910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CDC GOV, QUEEN ELIZABETH, II, UNITED NATIONS and others
Clarence Johnson, Jr. v. Kilbert, et al
as 21-35654
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
KILBERT, Federal Judge, UNITED NATIONS, EAST ST LOUIS ILL FEDERAL COURTS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
