Cases 11 - 20 of 120
Fuel Senders - Dealership Actions
as 2:2012cv00302
In Re:
Fuel Senders - Dealership Actions
Plaintiff:
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc, Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. 12-11156 Doing business as Landers Toyota, Hammett Motor Company, Inc and others
Defendant:
Yazaki Corporation, Yazaki North America, Incorporated, Denso Corporation and others
Interested Party:
Katherine Clemons, Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd., American Furukawa, Inc. and others
Instrument Panel Clusters - Dealership Actions
as 2:2012cv00202
In Re:
Instrument Panel Clusters - Dealership Actions
Plaintiff:
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc, Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. 12-11156 Doing business as Landers Toyota, Hammett Motor Company, Inc and others
Defendant:
Yazaki Corporation, Yazaki North America, Incorporated, Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd. and others
Interested Party:
American Furukawa Inc., Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd., Katherine Clemons and others
Issouf Coubaly, et al v. Cargill Incorporated, et al
as 22-7104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Issouf Coubaly, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members, Sidiki Bamba, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members, Tenimba Djamoutene, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Cargill Incorporated, Nestle USA Inc., Cargill Cocoa and others
Richard L. Thalman v. First Hospital Laboratories, Inc.
as 22-1540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD L. THALMAN, Doctor, doing business as THALMAN CHIROPRACTIC & WELLNESS CENTER, on behalf of plaintiff and the class members defined herein
Defendant / Appellee:
FIRST HOSPITAL LABORATORIES, INC., doing business as FSSOLUTIONS
George Engurasoff, et al v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., et al
as 22-15419
Not Classified By Court:
In re: COCA-COLA PRODUCTS MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION (NO. II)
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GEORGE ENGURASOFF, JOSHUA OGDEN, PAUL MERRITT and others
Appellant:
ALBERTO SOLER-SOMOHANO, Intervenor-Punitive Class Member
Defendant / Appellee:
COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC., THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY and others
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02521
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Teikoku Pharma USA, Teikoku Seiyaku Co, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Not Classified By Court:
All Parties, Express Scripts, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muehe, et al v. Norkunas
as 21-1981
Interested Party:
WILLIAM NORKUNAS, class member
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN FLANAGAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CRYSTAL EVANS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, MICHAEL MUEHE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and ELAINE HAMILTON, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
BOSTON, MA
Dowe v. Prudential Financial Inc.
as 21-3069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Maureen Dowe, individually and on behalf of those Class Members similarly situated, Elvie Moore and Esther Buckram
Defendant / Appellee:
Leeds, Morelli and Brown PC, Leeds, Morelli and Brown LLP, Lenard Leeds and others
Defendant:
Prudential Financial Inc., successor to Prudential Securities Inc., Leeds and Morelli, Gerald E. Harper and others
John Doe 1, et al v. Apple Inc., et al
as 21-7135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Doe 1, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members, John Doe 2, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members, Jane Doe 1, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc., Microsoft Corp. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
