Cases 11 - 18 of 18
KATES v. BRIDGETON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2010cv06386
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND D. KATES
Defendant:
BRIDGETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POTTER v. REILLY et al
as 1:2010cv02328
Plaintiff:
KEVIN POTTER
Defendant:
JON REILLY, RONALD J. CASELLA, KENNETH A. PAGLIUGHI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATFORD v. BALICKI et al
as 1:2009cv05271
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MARVIN WATFORD
Defendant:
ROBERT BALICKI, ROBERT SCIORE, KENNETH LAMPKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Village of Greenup et al
as 3:2009cv00699
Plaintiff:
Donna K Pearson
Defendant:
FBI, Director of FBI, Mayor of Greenup Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pearson v. Village of Greenup et al
as 2:2009cv02215
Plaintiff:
Donna K Pearson
Defendant:
FBI, Director of FBI, Mayor of Greenup Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JACOBS v. THE CITY OF BRIDGETON et al
as 1:2009cv03035
Plaintiff:
REUBEN A. JACOBS, SR.
Defendant:
THE CITY OF BRIDGETON, THE BRIDGETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDANIEL v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2008cv01006
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL MCDANIEL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCDANIEL v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2008cv00978
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL MCDANIEL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
