Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Cervantes v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02131
Petitioner:
Cosme Castillo Cervantes
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gastelum v. Kool Smiles PC et al
as 2:2020cv02152
Defendant:
Benevis Corporation, Marc Auerbach, KS AZ-2 PC and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Martin Gastelum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cervantes v. Tokio Marine America Insurance Company et al
as 2:2020cv01339
Defendant:
Unknown Parties and Tokio Marine America Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Martinez v. Chula Vista Landscaping Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00229
Defendant:
Manuel Cervantes, Alfredo Zavala, Chula Vista Landscaping Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Martinez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wright v. Rosales et al
as 2:2019cv05191
Plaintiff:
James Wright
Defendant:
R Rosales, A Ruiz and L Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cervantes v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03787
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Luis Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cervantes v. Penzone
as 2:2019cv02933
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Plaintiff:
Leticia Isabel Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cervantes v. Penzone
as 2:2019cv01739
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Plaintiff:
Jessie Delilah Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valentini #268586 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv04247
Defendant:
Unknown Geanes, Unknown Ostrander, Unknown Abbott and others
Plaintiff:
Rick Wayne Valentini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Arreola et al
as 2:2018cv00573
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant:
Socorro Cervantes Arreola, Gabriel Arreola Portillo and Amiga LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
