Cases 11 - 20 of 35
John Smith v. Sandra Aldridge, et al
as 20-35624
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL D. WEISSER, in their entire personal and professional capacities, ANTHONY GOLIK, in their entire personal and professional capacities, SANDRA ALDRIDGE, in their entire personal and professional capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN GARRETT SMITH
KOPCIK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31431
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD ANDREW KOPCIK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KRAFT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv16919
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD ANDREW KRAFT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv14898
Plaintiff:
CHAD ANDREW YOUNG
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larsen v. U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit et al
as 4:2020cv03420
Defendant:
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Bybee, Watford and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Andrew Larsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv52798
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDREWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv23831
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chad Larsen v. Stuart Sherman
as 20-70170
Petitioner:
CHAD ANDREW LARSEN
Respondent:
STUART SHERMAN, Warden
Smith v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2019cv05600
Defendant:
Daniel Lloyd, James Mcelvain, Rotha Yong and others
Plaintiff:
John Garrett Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latham v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;
as 2:2018cv00200
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Chad Andrew Latham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
