Cases 11 - 20 of 54
ACKLEY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2020cv00621
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL L. BENEWAY, ANDREW K. CROFT, CRAIG J. DICK and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY et al v. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
as 1:2019cv03562
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE SAVAGE and NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY
Defendant:
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
ENGLISH v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv02534
Petitioner:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA and others
Amicus Curiae:
STENY HOYER, BRAD SHERMAN, ELIZABETH WARREN and others
Defendant:
JOHN MICHAEL MULVANEY, DONALD JOHN TRUMP and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
LEANDRA ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
HUGEE v. HAWKINS et al
as 1:2017cv01236
Plaintiff:
RICKY HUGEE
Defendant:
CHARLIE HAWKINS, LAMOND HAWKINS and HAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAMBERS v. CCA/CTF et al
as 1:2017cv00682
Plaintiff:
JAMES MARCELL CHAMBERS
Defendant:
CCA/CTF, CHARLIE PETERSON, DRUMMOND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY and CHARLIE SAVAGE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
WARREN v CCA CORPORATION, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. WARREN
Defendant:
CCA CORPORATION, INC., CENTRAL TREATMENT FACILITY, CHARLIE PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. PETERSON et al
as 1:2015cv01388
Petitioner:
CLARENCE BAKER
Respondent:
CHARLIE PETERSON and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WATFORD v. PETERSON
as 1:2015cv01206
Petitioner:
KENNETH WATFORD
Respondent:
CHARLIE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
