Cases 11 - 20 of 168
Weaver v. Christian County
as 3:2023cv03177
Petitioner:
Patrick V Weaver
Respondent:
Christian County
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Christian County, Missouri et al
as 6:2023cv03107
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Wells
Defendant:
Christian County, Missouri, Sheriff Brad Cole, Deputy Megan Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Christian County Jail
as 5:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Byran Christopher Jones
Defendant:
Christian County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Hicks et al
as 5:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Lena Akers
Defendant:
Deputy Gary Hicks, Aaron Acree, Trigg County Fiscal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brandon Harris v. Brian Rives, et al
as 22-5838
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MARQUE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BRIAN RIVES, DEPUTY J. L. HENDRICKS, DEPUTY JOHN HURT and others
Brandon Harris v. Brian Rives, et al
as 22-5834
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MARQUE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BRIAN RIVES, DEPUTY J. L. HENDRICKS, DEPUTY JOHN HURT and others
Carroll v. Boyd et al
as 5:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Carroll
Defendant:
Brad Boyd, Christian County Jail, Wendall Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doty v. Wilson et al
as 6:2022cv03168
Plaintiff:
Christina Doty
Defendant:
Matthew Wilson and Christian County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brandon Harris v. Brian Rives, et al
as 22-5490
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MARQUE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT BRIAN RIVES, DEPUTY J. L. HENDRICKS, DEPUTY JOHN HURT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
