Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Joiner v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, The
as 2:2013cv02204
Plaintiff:
Torcha A. Joiner
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama, The, James D. Love, III, William A. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Birmingham, Alabama et al
as 2:2013cv01006
Plaintiff:
Latisha Williams
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama, William A. Bell, Sr., Herman Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. City of Birmingham, Alabama et al
as 2:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
Justin A White
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama and William A Bell, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Minnifield et al v. The City of Birmingham Alabama
as 2:2012cv02590
Plaintiff:
Montague Minnifield and Merriman Bell
Defendant:
The City of Birmingham Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lacey v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, et al
as 2:2012cv00399
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Lacey
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama and The Mayor of City of Birmingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. City of Birmingham, Alabama
as 2:2010cv02591
Plaintiff:
Ricky Green
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
James v. City of Birmingham, Alabama et al
as 2:2010cv02082
Plaintiff:
Antonio James
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama, A. C. Roper, Katrina Looney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Patrick v. City of Birmingham, Alabama et al
as 2:2009cv01825
Plaintiff:
Earl Patrick
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama, Annetta W Nunn and A.C. Roper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
