Cases 11 - 20 of 36
HORN v. MACON et al
as 5:2014cv00364
Plaintiff:
DEEANN HORN
Defendant:
CITY OF MACON , MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT , MACON BIBB COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BREWSTER v. MACON et al
as 5:2014cv00035
Plaintiff:
JIMMY BREWSTER
Defendant:
CITY OF MACON , CLAYTON SUTTON , LISA SAPP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS v. MACON et al
as 5:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
CLEMMIE WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
CITY OF MACON, PARROTT, AL CLOUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HORTON v. MACON
as 5:2013cv00467
Plaintiff:
JOHN HORTON
Defendant:
CITY OF MACON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullins v. City of Macon, Mississippi et al
as 4:2013cv00182
Plaintiff:
Lakesha Mullins
Defendant:
City of Macon, Mississippi and Andreas Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG et al v. MACON et al
as 5:2013cv00362
Plaintiff:
HENRY YOUNG, SR and CHRISTINE YOUNG
Defendant:
CITY OF MACON and JEREMY MALONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spokane Airport Board v. Michael Huerta, et al
as 13-71172
Petitioner:
SPOKANE AIRPORT BOARD
Petitioner-Intervenor:
CITY OF MACON, GEORGIA
Respondent:
MICHAEL P. HUERTA, Administrator and FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Tonty Hill, Sr., et al v. Macon Police Department, et al
as 13-11202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY HILL, SR. and TONY HILL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF MACON GEORGIA, ANTOINNE JORDAN, Officer and others
City of Rome, Georgia, et al v. Hotels.Com, L.P., et al
as 12-14588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF ROME, GEORGIA, HART COUNTY, CITY OF CARTERSVILLE, GEORGIA, and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HOTELS.COM, L.P., HOTWIRE, INC., TRIP NETWORK, INC., d.b.a. Cheaptickets.com and others
:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
