Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Martin v. City of Mobile et al
as 1:2017cv00145
Plaintiff:
George Martin
Defendant:
City of Mobile, Alabama, County of Mobile, Alabama, Thomas Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thai Meditation Association of Alabama, Inc. et al v. City of Mobile, Alabama et al
as 1:2016cv00395
Plaintiff:
Thai Meditation Association of Alabama, Inc. , Sivaporn Nimityongskul , Varin Nimityongskul and others
Defendant:
City of Mobile, Alabama , City of Mobile City Council and City of Mobile Planning Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longmire v. City of Mobile, Alabama et al
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
Carla Longmire
Defendant:
City of Mobile, Alabama , Sandy S. Stimpson , James Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cellular South Real Estate v. City of Mobile, Alabama
as 1:2015cv00387
Plaintiff:
Cellular South Real Estate
Defendant:
City of Mobile, Alabama
Cause Of Action: Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rachel v. City of Mobile, Alabama et al
as 1:2013cv00522
Plaintiff:
Amy Rachel
Defendant:
City of Mobile, Alabama and Michael T. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mingo v. City of Mobile, Alabama
as 1:2012cv00056
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Mingo
Defendant:
City of Mobile, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bethel et al v. The City of Mobile, Alabama et al
as 1:2010cv00535
Plaintiff:
Glynis Bethel and Orlando Bethel
Defendant:
The City of Mobile, Alabama, Sam Jones, Michael Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
