Cases 11 - 20 of 76
Elem v. Dupnik et al
as 4:2014cv02333
Plaintiff:
Larry Elem
Defendant:
Clarence W Dupnik, Pima County Jail and Unknown Domingas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Elem v. Dupnik et al
as 4:2014cv02334
Plaintiff:
Larry Elem
Defendant:
Clarence W Dupnik and Unknown Domingas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Valle Del Sol Incorporated, et al v. Robert Haney
as 14-16506
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VALLE DEL SOL INCORPORATED, C.M., a minor, JOSE ANGEL VARGAS and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, EDWARD G. RHEINHEIMER, DAVID W. ROZEMA and others
Intervenor-Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA and JANICE K. BREWER
Appellant:
ROBERT B. HANEY
Radcliff # 135361 v. Dupnik et al
as 4:2014cv02214
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Radcliff
Defendant:
Clarence W Dupnik, Unknown Silva, Unknown Overton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sundown v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2014cv02211
Plaintiff:
Daiv K Sundown
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Clarence W Dupnik and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon Bales v. Clarence Dupnik, et al
as 14-16067
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRANDON EUGENE BALES
Respondent - Appellee:
CLARENCE W. DUPNIK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA and CHARLES L. RYAN
Elem v. Domingas et al
as 4:2014cv02103
Plaintiff:
Larry Elem
Defendant:
Unknown Domingas and Clarence W Dupnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ledvina v. Marana, Town of et al
as 4:2014cv01989
Plaintiff:
Martial Ledvina
Defendant:
Marana, Town of, Terry Rozema, Unknown Rozema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Espinoza v. Stewart et al
as 4:2013cv01998
Plaintiff:
Adrien Joshua Espinoza
Defendant:
Unknown Stewart, Unknown Torez, Unknown Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. Dupnik et al
as 4:2013cv01869
Plaintiff:
Cody Charles Blackmon, Jr.
Defendant:
Clarence W Dupnik, Pima County Board of Supervisors and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
