Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Morgan v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2016cv01290
Defendant:
Hon. Edith Brown Clement, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of the Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States and others
Plaintiff:
Caroline Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Robinson v. Inmate Trust Fund et al
as 4:2016cv03033
Plaintiff:
Dayrin Lemond Robinson
Defendant:
Inmate Trust Fund, Fifth Court of Appeals and Court of Appeals 5th District, Clerk of Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trowbridge, Jr. v. Lew et al
as 4:2016cv02747
Plaintiff:
John Parks Trowbridge, Jr.
Defendant:
Jacob Joseph Lew, Department of Treasury, Eric Himpton Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robinson v. Inmate Trust Fund et al
as 4:2016cv02479
Plaintiff:
Dayrin Lemond Robinson
Defendant:
Inmate Trust Fund, Fifth Court of Appeals and Court of Appeals 5th District, Clerk of Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00044
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Blair v. Kern et al
as 4:2014mc02740
Defendant:
Robert Kern, Evelyn Keyes, Sherri Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Blair
Matthews v. Rhymes et al
as 6:2014cv00784
Plaintiff:
Dedrick Matthews
Defendant:
Linda Ruth Rhymes and Smith County, Clerk of Court Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00757
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Emmett v. Office of Clerk of Court et al
as 3:2010cv02066
Plaintiff:
Barry Emmett
Defendant:
Office of Clerk of Court and Teena McNeely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emmett v. Office of Clerk of Court et al
as 7:2010cv00156
Plaintiff:
Barry Emmett
Defendant:
Office of Clerk of Court and Teena McNeely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
