Cases filed in Kansas
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Reed v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02314
Plaintiff: Carole Reed
Defendant: Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. and Colgate-Palmolive Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Niemann v Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02308
Defendant: Colgate-Palmolive Company and Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.
Plaintiff: Patricia Niemann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell et al v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02285
Defendant: Colgate-Palmolive Company and Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michael Russell and JODI RUSSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bone et al v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02284
Plaintiff: Abraham Mejia, Bradley Mace, Christy Zisser and others
Defendant: John Does 1 - 10, Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc., Colgate-Palmolive Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
In Re: Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc., Dog Food Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2019md02887
In Re: All Defendants (for Lead/Liaison Counsel ONLY), All Plaintiffs (for Lead/Liaison Counsel ONLY), Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc., Dog Food Products Liability Litigation and others
Interested Party: Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation and Ms. Diana Anja Eichhorn-Burkhard
Defendant: Colgate-Palmolive Company, John Does 1 - 10, Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Patterson v. Johnson County, Kansas et al
as 5:2010cv04133
Plaintiff: Michael J. Patterson
Defendant: Johnson County, Kansas, Sedgwick County, Kansas, Wichita Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Colgate-Palmolive Company, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02622
Plaintiff: Leo E. Butler, Leo E. Butler and Leo E. Butler
Defendant: Colgate-Palmolive Company, Inc. and Franklin Burch
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?