Cases 11 - 20 of 23
DYER v. COMMISIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2019cv00082
Plaintiff:
AUDREY B. DYER
Defendant:
COMMISIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
CHENEY v. COMMISIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2015cv01257
Plaintiff:
KIM ANN CHENEY
Defendant:
COMMISIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CHENEY v. COMMISIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2015cv01527
Plaintiff:
KIM ANN CHENEY
Defendant:
COMMISIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FOERCH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2015cv00856
Plaintiff:
MARTHA BARBARA FOERCH
Defendant:
COMMISIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cruz v. Astrue et al
as 1:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
Tinamarie Cruz
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Commisioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KLIVE v. MAYOR: MICHAEL NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv00172
Plaintiff:
KENNETH KLIVE
Defendant:
MAYOR: MICHAEL NUTTER, COMMISIONER: LOUIS GIORLA, WARDEN: DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAIXMEL v. MAYOR: MICHAEL NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv04765
Plaintiff:
KENNETH FAIXMEL
Defendant:
MAYOR: MICHAEL NUTTER, COMMISIONER: LOUIS GIORLA, WARDEN: DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WYANT v. COMMISIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2010cv00063
Plaintiff:
HEATHER WYANT
Defendant:
COMMISIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MCKEON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2009cv04571
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MCKEON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, EDWARD RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
