Cases 11 - 20 of 474
Cook v. Cuyahoga County et al.
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Jamika Cook
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County and Patrick F. Corrigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Nicole Lee Cook
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hosseinipour v. Cook et al.
as 4:2023cv02307
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Hosseinipour
Defendant:
Dallas Cook, Natasha Cook and Coitsville Police Department, Ohio 44436
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Peters et al.
as 3:2023cv02210
Plaintiff:
William H Cook, III
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Gregory Patton, S. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cook v. Peters et al.
as 3:2023cv02214
Plaintiff:
William H. Cook, III
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Christopher Bina, Warden David Lemaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cook v. Peters et al.
as 3:2023cv02211
Plaintiff:
William H. Cook, III
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Warden David Lemaster, S. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cook v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03490
Plaintiff:
Shelia Kovette Cook
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rankin v. Shapiro et al.
as 1:2023cv01975
Plaintiff:
Clarence Robert Rankin
Defendant:
Josh Shapiro, Xavior Becerra, Kilolo Kijakazi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Nelson et al.
as 5:2023cv01967
Plaintiff:
Craig Cook and Craig E. Cook
Defendant:
David C Nelson, Cell-O-Core Co., Cell-O-Core Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Cook v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02902
Plaintiff:
William R. Cook
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
