Cases 11 - 20 of 32
TUCKER v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2019cv00287
Defendant:
K. ADAMS, UNKNOWN NAMED WHITE MALE FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGIST, MILES KIVETT and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2019cv00286
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant:
OLD AGE RETIREMENT PENSION AT SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICES COMMISSIONER AND UNKNOWN NAMED PERSONNEL/SUPERVISORS, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and BUREAU OF PRISON BUTNER MEDICAL CENTER, BUTNER N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TUCKER v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2019cv00277
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., SMITH/KEEFE COMMISSARY/PROVIDER, CATRINA THOMPSON and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. CRAVEN et al
as 1:2019cv00246
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant:
ADAMS, KEEFE, SGT. GUARD WHITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2019cv00236
Defendant:
DAVIS, TIFFANY HALL, BOBBY KIMBROUGH and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Medical Staff et al
as 5:2018ct03307
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Tucker
Defendant:
Dr. Amy M. Leeper, Forensic Psychologists and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Forensic Psychologists et al
as 5:2018ct03297
Defendant:
Sheriff Schatzman, Dr. Amy M. Leeper and Forensic Psychologists
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. KIVETT et al
as 1:2018cv00897
Defendant:
SHERIFF SCHATZMAN, CPL. KIVETT, CAPT. GUARD SETTLE and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. SHATZMAN
as 1:2011cv00132
Petitioner:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Respondent:
SHATZMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tucker v. United States District Court et al
as 5:2008hc02089
Petitioner:
Cornelius Tucker, Jr.
Defendant:
United States District Court, Terrence W. Boyle, Louise W. Flanagan and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
