Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Scotto v. Societe Air France
as 19-1456
Defendant / Appellee:
United Continental Holdings, Inc., Hawaii Public Housing Authority, Counsel of Record and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Livia Scotto
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02332
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Scotto v. United Airlines and its Subsidaries, et al et al
as 1:2018cv05622
Defendant:
Department of Social Security Administration, European Banking Authority, Barclays Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scotto v. European Banking Authority et al
as 1:2018cv07563
Defendant:
Department of Social Security Administration, European Banking Authority, Microsoft and others
Plaintiff:
Livia Mary Scotto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Scotto et al v. McClean et al
as 8:2017cv02730
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto, Carmela A. Sciabarra and Angela M. Scotto
Defendant:
Jessica Marie McClean, The Concetta Scotto Trust, The Benjamin Shapiro Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Scotto v. Smiesk et al
as 8:2016cv02941
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Defendant:
Jeff Smiesk, Brett Hart, Oscar Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gotham City Online, LLC, et al v. Art.com, Inc.
as 14-16253
Plaintiff:
GOTHAM CITY ONLINE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Appellant:
BRAUNHAGEY & BORDEN, LLP, former counsel of Record for Gotham City Online, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
ART.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation
Gotham City Online, LLC, et al v. Art.com, Inc.
as 14-15538
Plaintiff:
GOTHAM CITY ONLINE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Appellant:
BRAUNHAGEY & BORDEN, LLP, former counsel of Record for Gotham City Online, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
ART.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation
High Point, S.A.R.L. v. Future Wei Technologies, Inc., et al.
as 3:2010cv00273
Petitioner:
In re Application of High Point, S.A.R.L. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1782
Respondent:
Future Wei Technologies, Inc. through counsel of record and Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. through counsel of record
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
