Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williams v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv01744
Petitioner:
Marland D. Williams
Respondent:
State of Alabama and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGhee v. Hale et al
as 2:2014cv01532
Plaintiff:
Franklin D McGhee
Defendant:
Mike Hale, C Davis, Swanson Services Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hale et al
as 2:2014cv01411
Plaintiff:
Michael D Williams
Defendant:
Mike Hale, Miller, David Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corporate America Car Wash System et al v. The Birmingham Parking Authority et al
as 2:2014cv00866
Plaintiff:
Corporate America Car Wash System and Michael D Williams
Defendant:
The Birmingham Parking Authority , Kevin Owens , Larry Warde and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Corporate America Car Wash System et al v. Birmingham, Ala, City of, The et al
as 2:2014cv00781
Plaintiff:
Corporate America Car Wash System and Michael D Williams
Defendant:
Birmingham, Ala, City of, The , William Bell , Don Lupo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Madden v. Gay et al
as 4:2014cv00532
Petitioner:
Fred Allen Madden
Respondent:
David Gay, David Canidate, K. D. William and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2012cv03960
Plaintiff:
Constance D Williams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. APAC Mid-South, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00845
Plaintiff:
Benjamin D. Williams
Defendant:
APAC Mid-South, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
