Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Godfrey v. Rustin et al
as 1:2018cv01193
Plaintiff:
Terrance D Godfrey
Defendant:
Emily Rustin, Jen Davis, Tracy Kjellesdik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramon Murillo v. D. Godfrey et al
as 2:2018cv02342
Defendant:
M. Allen, M. Allen, California Correctional Health Care Services and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Murillo
Godfrey v. Melvin et al
as 1:2017cv01210
Plaintiff:
Terrance D Godfrey
Defendant:
Michael Melvin, Emily Ruskin, . Marano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elmer Moreno Mendoza et al v. F. Sanchez et al
as 2:2016cv08159
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Allen, Correctional Officer Allen, Sgt D. Godfrey and others
Plaintiff:
Elmer Moreno Mendoza
Kenjuan Adams v. F. Garcia et al
as 2:2016cv06510
Plaintiff:
Kenjuan Adams
Defendant:
Correctional Officer F. Garcia, Correctional Officer D. Godfrey, Correctional Officer L. Ray and others
Godfrey v. Easton et al
as 3:2016cv00496
Plaintiff:
Terrance D Godfrey
Defendant:
Bryan Easton, Tyler Jaimet, Pamela Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph A Johnson v. Kathleen Dickinson et al
as 2:2014cv03390
Defendant:
B. Adams, Robert A Barton, K. Beltran and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph A Johnson
BELL et al v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2011cv04047
Plaintiff:
DAVID BELL, WILLIE F. BECKTON, VICTORIA DUPREE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
GODFREY et al v. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 5:2009cv80062
Plaintiff:
JAMES SANDY GODFREY and SANDRA D GODFREY
Defendant:
AW CHESTERTON COMPANY, CLEAVER BROOKS INC, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Godfrey et al v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 0:2009cv01592
Plaintiff:
James Sandy Godfrey and Sandra D Godfrey
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company, Cleaver Brooks Inc, Borg Warner Morse TEC Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
