Cases 11 - 20 of 108
(HC) Haynes v. Merchant
as 2:2023cv00003
Petitioner:
Michael D. Haynes
Respondent:
J. Merchant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelton v. Mathena, et al
as 7:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Defendant:
Rector, Tracy Mathena, Tim Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Anderson, et al
as 7:2022cv00699
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Defendant:
David Anderson, Tracy Mathena, Sgt. J. Coe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Estate of Gary Lin Haynes
as 1:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Ole D Haynes
Defendant:
Estate of Gary Lin Haynes
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Lumumba v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
Askari Danso M.S. Lumumba
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Joseph W. Walters, David Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Estate of Gary Lin Haynes
as 2:2022cv00920
Plaintiff:
Ole D Haynes
Defendant:
Gary Haynes and Estate of Gary Lin Haynes
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Rivera v. Haynes et al
as 7:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
D. Haynes, David Anderson, White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
Derrick A. Edwards
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, David A. Robinson, M. Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00182
Defendant:
M. D. Sturgill, David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. River North Correctional Center et al
as 7:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Vincent A. Hardy, Jr.
Defendant:
River North Correctional Center, Stoyer, Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
