Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 44
PATTERSON v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff: ROLONDA PATTERSON
Defendant: KEVIN SPROUL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY, PHOEBE PHYSICIANS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. DONALD TRUMP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00073
Defendant: DONALD TRUMP, DAVID SAMPSON and WILLIAM BARR
Plaintiff: FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Hunter v. Rouse, et al
as 20-17220
Defendant / Appellee: STACEY, Supervisor, SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT, ROUSE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
David Hunter v. Sacramento Superior Court
as 20-17149
Respondent / Appellee: SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
SAMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv87475
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: DAVID SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv74841
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: DAVID SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Hunter, et al v. Scott Jones, et al
as 20-15990
Defendant / Appellee: JACKSON, Badge #713 and SCOTT JONES
Plaintiff: DEANDRE FOWLER
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
(PC) Hunter v. Rouse, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00159
Plaintiff: David Sampson Hunter
Defendant: Stacey, Jennifer, Ahmed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hunter et al v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02340
Plaintiff: DeAndre Fowler and David Sampson Hunter
Defendant: Jackson and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Hunter v. Carolyn Fetch, et al
as 19-16006
Defendant / Appellee: SACRAMENTO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Probation illegal warrant and CAROLYN FETCH
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?