Cases 11 - 20 of 76
Lambert v. Appalachian Power Company et al
as 1:2018cv01346
Defendant:
Utility Lines Construction Services, Inc., Appalachian Power Company and American Electric Power Service Corporation
Plaintiff:
Dawson Lambert
Undetermined:
Charles S. Piccirillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dawson v. USA
as 3:2018cv00160
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Anthony S. Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04134
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04132
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Dawson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
Patricia Dawson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cline v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association et al
as 3:2017cv02975
Plaintiff:
Santana Cline
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, National Association , Reisenfeld & Associates and Christopher Dawson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cline v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association et al
as 2:2017cv02975
Plaintiff:
Santana Cline
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Reisenfeld & Associates and Christopher Dawson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dawson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01324
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Dawson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lancaster v. Todd et al
as 1:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lancaster
Defendant:
J. Todd, Artrip, B. Kunkle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dawson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06624
Plaintiff:
Donna Dawson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
