Cases 11 - 20 of 31
SNYDER v. DCS et al
as 1:2022cv01154
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE E. SNYDER
Defendant:
DCS, AUBREY JENKINS, SUZANNE CONGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
SHI v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00766
Plaintiff:
XIAOLONG SHI
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, TODD ROKITA, INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMAS v. DCS et al
as 1:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
BRENDA THOMAS
Defendant:
DCS, SHAMEKA NEWMAN and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SPIVEY v. DCS
as 1:2021cv02586
Plaintiff:
SHELIA SPIVEY
Defendant:
DCS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp
Shicks v. Fort Wayne City of et al
as 1:2021cv00224
Defendant:
Mitchell Gerber, DHS, Cathy T Serrano and others
Plaintiff:
Stuart Jon Shicks
Not Classified By Court:
C Erik Chickedantz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
3BTech Inc v. Garelick et al
as 3:2021cv00034
Defendant:
Meyer, Olson, Lowy & Meyers, LLP and Marc Harris Garelick
Plaintiff:
3BTech Inc, Hoverzon, LLC and DC 3B, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
3BTech, Inc. et al v. Wang et al
as 3:2020cv00637
Defendant:
Jie Wang and Marc Harris Garelick
Plaintiff:
3BTech, Inc. and DC 3B, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
CALDWELL v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2019cv00526
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, VIGO COUNTY DCS, HALEY LINDLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA JAMES CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IMEL v. DC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00634
Defendant:
DUSTIN CALHOUN and DC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL IMEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PFENDER v. DCS et al
as 3:2017cv00035
Defendant:
JOYCE BROWN, NICHOLE CHANDLEY, DCS and others
Plaintiff:
JANE ANN PFENDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
