Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Coffman v. Maldonado et al
as 6:2015cv00016
Plaintiff: Dan Coffman
Defendant: Martha A. Maldonado and Assistant Warden Rene Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffman et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp., et al
as 0:2013cv03304
Plaintiff: Barbara Coffman and Dan Coffman
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dan Coffman v. Daniel Craig, et al
as 13-50604
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAN COFFMAN
Defendant - Appellee: DANIEL C. CRAIG, FNU GLASSDICK, MARK E. MINSHEW and others
Coffman v. Craig et al
as 6:2013cv00175
Plaintiff: Dan Coffman
Defendant: Daniel C. Craig, FNU Glassdick, Mark E. Minshew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffman v. Thaler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv03214
Petitioner: Dan Coffman
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dan Coffman v. Daniel Hoepfner, et al
as 11-10206
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAN COFFMAN
Defendant - Appellee: DANIEL HOEPFNER, NICHOLAS A. FLOOD and KEVIN DANIELS
Coffman v. Hoepfner et al
as 7:2011cv00014
Plaintiff: Dan Coffman
Defendant: Daniel Hoepfner, Nicholas A Flood and Kevin Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffman v. Hoepener et al
as 7:2010cv00189
Plaintiff: Dan Coffman
Defendant: Daniel Hoepener, NFN Sadios, Nicholas A Flood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dan Coffman v. Pedro Boykin, et al
as 10-40379
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAN COFFMAN
Defendant - Appellee: PEDRO M BOYKIN, KEITH GORSUCH and DARLINDA WHEELER
Coffman v. Boykin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00186
Plaintiff: Dan Coffman
Defendant: Pedro M Boykin, Keith E Gorsuch and Darlinda Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?