Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Todd v. Moultrie et al
as 8:2018cv00851
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Todd
Defendant:
Darius Moultrie, S Beadling, Cpl Legg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyke et al v. Staphen et al
as 6:2018cv00402
Plaintiff:
Louis Reville, Wendell Beverly, Roger Allen Dyke and others
Defendant:
Michael Staphen, Anite Stevens, Laura H Kawaguchi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ransom-Williams v. Carthledge et al
as 0:2013cv02722
Plaintiff:
Darius Ra'Sean Ransom-Williams
Defendant:
Leroy Carthledge, Mr Parker, Mr Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Revolutions Medical Corporation v. Strategic Product Development Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02793
Plaintiff:
Revolutions Medical Corporation
Defendant:
Strategic Product Development Inc, Rink Development Company LLC, Ice Huts Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Joy et al v. McLellan et al
as 6:2012cv01140
Plaintiff:
Arthur Mills Joy and Carolyn Joy
Defendant:
William A McLellan, Recover Incorporated, Darius Gist and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2701
Belle v. USA
as 3:2011cv03520
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Darius Belle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Various Vehicles et al
as 2:2011cv01528
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Various Vehicles, Funds and Real Properties
Claimant:
Truman Levi Lewis, Harry T Lewis and Darius D LaGroon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
McFadden v. Aikens et al
as 0:2011cv00899
Plaintiff:
Kiarra D McFadden
Defendant:
Linda L Aikens, Rashena E Benjamin, Derrick K Doughty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
