Cases 11 - 20 of 84
Adams v. Spaulding
as 1:2020cv10786
Petitioner:
David M. Adams
Respondent:
Warden Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Oliver et al
as 1:2020cv10479
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
James W. Oliver, Thomas J. Webb, Paul R. Webb, III and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Schram v. PMC Insurance Agency Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10307
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Schram
Defendant:
PMC Insurance Agency Inc., Andrew Shaw and David M Malloy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Fisher v. Town of Ludlow et al
as 3:2020cv30011
Plaintiff:
Tina Fisher
Defendant:
Police Chief Paul Madera, Town of Ludlow, Daniel Valadas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David M. Alessi, M.D., P.C. et al
as 1:2019cv12384
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Smith, M.D., P.C., LePort Surgical Medical Corp., Kent V. Hasen, M.D., P.A. and others
Defendant:
Cynosure, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC.
as 1:2019cv10439
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. and Renal Care Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David M. Freeman
Sinkula v. Select Income REIT et al
as 1:2018cv12389
Defendant:
William A. Lamkin, Donna D. Fraiche, Select Income REIT and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Sinkula
FRIEDT v. Moulder et al
as 1:2018cv11374
Defendant:
Leon O. Moulder, Jr., GARRY A. NICHOLSON, MARY LYNNE HEDLEY and others
Plaintiff:
GAIL FRIEDT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Martignetti et al v. City of Cambridge
as 1:2018cv10980
Plaintiff:
Victor A. Martignetti , David G. Albert , Keith Albert and others
Defendant:
City of Cambridge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Rivera v. City of Fitchburg et al
as 4:2017cv40165
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Rivera
Defendant:
City of Fitchburg, David M. Gordon and Stephen D. Bastien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
