Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe) v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe)
Defendant:
Truist Bank, The General Insurance Company, SunTrust Banks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. David M. Wolfford & Son, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01276
Plaintiff:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Defendant:
David M. Wolfford & Son, Inc., David M. Wolfford, Barbara J. Wolfford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Fairfax County et al
as 1:2021cv00800
Plaintiff:
Elon Wilson
Defendant:
Fairfax County, Jonathan Freitag, Jonathan Nytes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trotman v. Doe et al
as 2:2021cv00160
Defendant:
Antoinette Irving, Jane Doe and J. Doe
Plaintiff:
David M. Trotman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frizzell v. Clark
as 7:2020cv00685
Respondent:
Harold W. Clark
Petitioner:
David M. Frizzell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2020cv00658
Defendant:
John J. Brough, Chain Bridge Bank, N.A. and David M. Evinger
Plaintiff:
Blue Flame Medical LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lockley v. Barredo et al
as 3:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Darby Lowe and David M. Barredo
Plaintiff:
Christian Lockley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2020cv00169
Defendant:
Anna R. Cablik, Suntrust Corp., Steven C. Voorhees and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Rossi Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
