Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Seegolam v. Deutsche Bank
as 6:2012cv00422
Plaintiff:
Naipaul Seegolam
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank, Board of Governors, Bank of America, Board of Governors, Wells Fargo, Board of Governors and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Haney v. Blumenauer et al
as 3:2011cv00989
Defendant:
Gregory E Abel, Wedge Abels, Sam Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Azonia Haney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Delaney v. Rockefeller et al
as 0:2011cv61521
Plaintiff:
Larry Delaney
Defendant:
David Rockefeller, Jay Rockefeller, President Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0754
Delaney v. President Barack O'Bama et al
as 0:2011cv61444
Plaintiff:
Larry Delaney
Defendant:
President Barack O'Bama, Vice President Joseph Biden, David Rockefeller and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0754
Kelly v. Schnitzer et al
as 3:2011cv00211
Defendant:
Sam Adams, Bishop-White & Marshall, P.S., Lloyd C. Blankfein and others
Ee IRS) Internal Revenue Service:
Goldman Sachs & Company
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
David Rockefeller v. Comcast Corp, et al
as 10-4494
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROCKEFELLER
Defendant - Appellee:
COMCAST CORP and BRIAN ROBERTS, President/CEO of Comcast
ROCKEFELLER v. COMCAST CORPORATION et al
as 1:2010cv06004
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROCKEFELLER
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION and BRIAN ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROCKEFELLER v. BOROUGH OF LINDENWOLD et al
as 1:2009cv02967
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROCKEFELLER
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF LINDENWOLD, FRANK DELUCCA and LINDENWOLD POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROCKEFELLER v. BOCHMAN
as 1:2008cv00964
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROCKEFELLER
Defendant:
GERALDINE M BOCHMAN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROCKEFELLER v. BYRD
as 1:2007cv02186
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROCKEFELLER
Defendant:
ARNOLD BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
