Cases 11 - 20 of 896
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
State of Alabama et al v. Phelps
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Wilfred Phelps
Florence v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Florence
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Futral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Kendarius DeAndre Butler
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Corizon Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerley v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Steven Dale Byerley
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Christopher Randall Bailey
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Joshua Russell Sanders
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Charlie, Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Parrish v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00157
Petitioner:
Davey Lee Parrish
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Alabama, State of, Etowah County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Alabama et al v. Durham
as 2:2024mc00280
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Gregory Durham
State of Alabama et al v. Durham
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Gregory Durham
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
