Cases 11 - 20 of 120
BRIGHTWELL v. UNITED STATES PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 1:2015cv00247
Petitioner:
BOBBY BRIGHTWELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PROBATION AND PAROLE, PENNSYLVANIA PROBATION AND PAROLE, DELAWARE COUNTY, PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Valerya McGriff v. Pennsylvania State Civil Servi, et al
as 15-2538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VALERYA MCGRIFF
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION and DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dorothy Zosky v. Pennsylvania Department of Pub
as 14-4213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOROTHY ZOSKY
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
Rafael Joseph v. Pensylvania Department of Publ, et al
as 14-3665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAFAEL ANTONIO JOSEPH
Defendant:
BEEBAR and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
Defendant - Appellee:
JONES and MOSES, IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SOCIAL WORKERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE v. ROTENBERGER-DOLD et al
as 5:2014cv02801
Plaintiff:
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Defendant:
CYNTHIA ROTENBERGER-DOLD, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
In re: Rafael Joseph
as 14-2059
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: RAFAEL ANTONIO JOSEPH
Defendant - Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, MS. BEEBAR, JONES and others
Nominal Respondent:
THOMAS N. O'NEILL, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
