Cases 11 - 20 of 455
ELLERBE v. SEPTA
as 2:2023cv04134
Plaintiff:
DERRICK J. ELLERBE
Defendant:
SEPTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv03926
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Derrick Wilson
Defendant:
FORMER SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, Shawn A Brown, LAUREL HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Houston v. Garza
as 1:2023cv01483
Petitioner:
Derrick Houston
Respondent:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ELLERBE v. THE JUDICIAL OFFICER
as 2:2023cv03319
Plaintiff:
DERRICK J ELLERBE
Defendant:
THE JUDICIAL OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Rickard
as 4:2023cv01246
Petitioner:
Derrick Deandre Chapman
Respondent:
Warden Rickard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WOLFE et al v. THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv01170
Plaintiff:
DERRICK WOLFE and MARION WOLFE
Defendant:
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, SPEEDWAY LLC and CSC SERVICE WORKS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
BARNES v. HOUSER et al
as 2:2023cv02080
Petitioner:
DERRICK BARNES
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUSER and SCI-BENNER TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burton v. Craig et al
as 1:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Derrick Burton
Defendant:
Detective Daniel Craig and Springfield Township Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MUCHISON v. GRAY, et al
as 2:2023cv01172
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MUCHISON
Defendant:
BEVERLY GRAY, JANE MCCORY and DAWN JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
