Cases 11 - 20 of 95
Conboy et al v. U.S. Small Business Administration et al
as 3:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Desmond Conboy and Brendan Gilsenan
Defendant:
U.S. Small Business Administration , CBE Group , First National Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mercer v. USA
as 3:2018cv00141
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Desmond Mercer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ABERNATHY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02784
Plaintiff:
DESMOND ABERNATHY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, EDWARD WRIGHT and PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT. 12TH DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Arnold et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv01345
Plaintiff:
Paul H. Arnold , Theodore R Babcock , Connie R Babcock and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
WRIGHT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03232
Plaintiff:
DESMOND WRIGHT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CARNEY v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2016cv02787
Petitioner:
DESMOND CARNEY
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DINSMORE v. COUNTY OF BUTLER et al
as 2:2016cv00752
Plaintiff:
ADAM HALFSTEP DINSMORE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BUTLER , RICHARD T. SHAFFER , MIKE BARTLETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEELS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv00302
Plaintiff:
DESMOND KEELS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JAY LANE, STEVE BUZAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ABERNATHY v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF PROBATION & PAROLE et al
as 2:2015cv05700
Plaintiff:
DESMOND M. ABERNATHY
Defendant:
HUFFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
