Cases 11 - 20 of 20
DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. v. DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
as 3:2014cv06390
Petitioner:
DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC.
Respondent:
DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Loestrin 24 FE Antitrust Liti, et al, et al
as 14-2071
Plaintiff:
PROVIDENCE, RI, individually and on behalf of itself andall others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOC. OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY, III, LTD. and others
Loestrin 24 FE Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2013md02472
Plaintiff:
Fraternal Order of Police Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, HEB Grocery Company L.P., Rite-Aid Corporation and others
Defendant:
Warner Chilcott Holdings Company III, Ltd., Warner Chilcott Sales (US), LLC, Warner Chilcott Company, LLC and others
Interested Party:
Health Care Service Corporation, Caremark, LLC, CVS Health Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Direct Purchaser Class Plainti, et al v. NEC Corporation, et al
as 12-15295
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., MITSUI & CO. (TAIWAN), LTD., NEXGEN MEDIA TECH USA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Appellant:
MICHAEL J. RINIS, President, Rinis Travel, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JACO ELECTRONICS, INC. and DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
Direct Purchaser Class Plainti, et al v. NEC Corporation, et al
as 12-15295
:
In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS and JACO ELECTRONICS, INC.
Objector - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. RINIS, President, Rinis Travel, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
NEC CORPORATION, NEC LCD TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC. and others
Direct Purchaser Class Plainti, et al v. NEC Corporation, et al
as 12-15300
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., MITSUI & CO. (TAIWAN), LTD., NEXGEN MEDIA TECH USA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JACO ELECTRONICS, INC. and DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
Appellant:
BARRY HIMMELSTEIN
Direct Purchaser Class Plainti, et al v. NEC Corporation, et al
as 12-15300
:
In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS and JACO ELECTRONICS, INC.
Objector - Appellant:
BARRY HIMMELSTEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
NEC CORPORATION, NEC LCD TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC. and others
In Re: Mushroom Direct
as 09-2258
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS, PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS INC and GIANT EAGLE INC
Defendant:
FRANKLIN FARMS INC, CREEKSIDE MUSHROOMS, JM FARMS INC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
M.D. BASCIANI & SONS INC
Defendant - Appellee:
MUSHROOM COOPERATIVE DEFENDANTS
In Re: Mushroom Direct
as 09-2257
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS, PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS INC and GIANT EAGLE INC
Defendant - Appellant:
MUSHROOM COOPERATIVE DEFENDANTS
Defendant:
FRANKLIN FARMS INC, CREEKSIDE MUSHROOMS, JM FARMS INC and others
:
KITCHEN PRIDE MUSHROOMS
Defendant - Appellee:
M.D. BASCIANI & SONS INC
OWENS v. PFIZER, INC., et al
as 2:2002cv01390
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM OWENS , DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS, DIRECT PURCHASER NON-CLASS, AND END-PAYOR PLAINTIFFS , CVS PHARMACY, INC. and others
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY
Pecial_master:
PAUL R. RICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
