Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Ridgely et al v. Unitrin Safeguard Insurance Company et al
as 1:2016cv00022
Plaintiff:
Anne Dorsey Ridgely and Nancy Davis
Defendant:
Unitrin Safeguard Insurance Company , Kemper Corporation , Kemper Corporate Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
BOOKER v. USA
as 1:2015cv00919
Petitioner:
DORSEY LOUIS BOOKER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BOOKER v. USA
as 1:2015cv00672
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DORSEY LOUIS BOOKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
COVINGTON et al v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2015cv00399
Plaintiff:
SANDRA LITTLE COVINGTON , HERMAN BENTHLE LEWIS, JR. , VIOLA RYALS FIGUEROA and others
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROBERT A. RUCHO, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Colvin
as 5:2014cv00135
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Dorsey
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
LEAK v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF WINSTON SALEM et al
as 1:2013cv00837
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEAK
Defendant:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF WINSTON SALEM, LARRY C. WOODS, MARTHA C. DORSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Needham v. Whitener
as 5:2013cv00104
Petitioner:
Michael Dorsey Needham
Respondent:
Keith Whitener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dorsey v. Tripp
as 5:2013ct03171
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Dorsey, Jr.
Defendant:
Brick Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dorsey v. Johnson et al
as 5:2013cv00313
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dorsey
Defendant:
Dee Johnson and Gonzalo Cabral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dorsey v. Adventist Health System Sunbelt Health Care Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00217
Plaintiff:
Sherry Dorsey
Defendant:
Adventist Health System Sunbelt Health Care Corporation, Fletcher Hospital, Incorporated, Adventist Health System-Sunbelt, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
