Cases 11 - 20 of 95
Day et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2021cv00215
Plaintiff:
Michael Gonzalez, Lynna Fulton, Amanda Huemiller and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Loomis v. Johnson, et al
as 4:2020cv00866
Defendant:
Camille Johnson and Sheriff Garry Bush
Plaintiff:
Duane R Loomis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 4:2020cv00862
Defendant:
Camille Johnson
Plaintiff:
Duane R Loomis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. USA
as 4:2020cv00849
Petitioner:
Duane McCoy
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Smitty's/Cam2 303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
as 4:2020md02936
Defendant:
Smitty's Supply, Inc., CAM2 International L.L.C., Atwood Home Supply, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Blackmore, Clinton Curry, Ron Nash and others
Not Classified By Court:
Mabie Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davenport v. Charter Communications, LLC
as 4:2012cv00007
Plaintiff:
Penny Davenport, James Rachal, Jimmie III Floyd and others
Defendant:
Charter Communications, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Ballew v Saul
as 4:2020cv00765
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Duane K. Ballew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Fosdick et al v. Smitty's Supply, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00429
Plaintiff:
Duane Fosdick and Jack Kimmich
Defendant:
Tractor Supply Company, Smitty's Supply, Inc. and CAM2 International L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon v. Myers et al
as 2:2020cv04084
Plaintiff:
Paul Duane Gordon
Defendant:
Danny Morrison, Rich Myers and Polk County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Myers et al
as 2:2020cv04085
Plaintiff:
Paul Duane Gordon
Defendant:
Danny Morrison, Rich Myers and Polk County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
