Cases 11 - 20 of 174
WELLS v. BAGIENSKI et al
as 1:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
QUANARDEL WELLS
Defendant:
MISSY BAGIENSKI, LISA HAMBLEN, MERSHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ragan v. Galipeau et al
as 4:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Duane Ragan
Defendant:
John Galipeau, John Salyer, Chad Mullencupp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ragan v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Duane Ragan
Defendant:
John Galipeau, John Salyer, Chad Mullencupp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUAN v. M X PAN INCORPORATED d/b/a FORMOSA SEAFOOD BUFFET et al
as 1:2022cv02333
Plaintiff:
KUN DUAN
Defendant:
MX PAN INCORPORATED d/b/a FORMOSA SEAFOOD BUFFET, SIU WONG PING a/ka/ SIUWONG PING a/k/a PETER PAN and MIN XIU DONG a/k/a MINXIU DONG
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kazmierczak v. Parry et al
as 2:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
Kyle A. Kazmierczak
Defendant:
Duane Parry and Michigan City Indiana City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
LONGEST v. MILLER et al
as 2:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
CODY DUANE LONGEST
Defendant:
MILLER, KANEIPP, KITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bauer v. Parry
as 3:2022cv00736
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jason Bauer
Defendant:
Duane Parry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIMES v. KERAMIDA ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
as 1:2022cv01598
Plaintiff:
DUANE GRIMES
Defendant:
KERAMIDA ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2022cv00313
Defendant:
JARED MYNATT, DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Cooper et al
as 3:2022cv00584
Plaintiff:
Duane Fuller
Defendant:
Cooper, Candy and Meza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
