Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Lewis v. City of Tupelo et al
as 1:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Willie Lewis
Defendant:
City of Tupelo, Dustin Tutor, Sam Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Reyes v. The United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Gay Lynn Reyes
Defendant:
The United States Department of Justice, The State of Alabama, The State of Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oswalt v. City of Booneville, Mississippi et al
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Oswalt
Defendant:
City of Booneville, Mississippi, Dustin Rambo, Michael Ramey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shoemake v. Forrest County Adult Detention Facility et al
as 2:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
Dustin Karl Shoemake
Defendant:
Forrest County Adult Detention Facility, Avery Hatten, C-59 and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Mack
as 3:2021cv00822
Plaintiff:
Carmelita Williams, Janice Alexander and Tekemia Bennett
Defendant:
Dustin Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Polovich v. Metropolitan General Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv00400
Plaintiff:
Dustin Polovich
Defendant:
Metropolitan General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. Mack
as 3:2021cv00648
Plaintiff:
Ariba Alexander
Defendant:
Dustin Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin v. USA
as 1:2020cv00346
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dustin Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ross v. Mississippi Dept Correction Record Dept.
as 3:2020cv00111
Petitioner:
Dustin Curtis Ross
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Respondent:
Mississippi Dept Correction Record Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00825
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
