Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Smith v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv01903
Plaintiff:
Ermagene E Smith
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Atkinson et al v. Builders Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2011cv02302
Plaintiff:
Ebbie James Atkinson , Kelly Atkinson , Charles A Counterman, Jr and others
Defendant:
Builders Mutual Insurance Company , Mungo Company, The, Associated Developers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Penza
as 0:2011cv02212
Plaintiff:
Titus E Smith
Defendant:
M Penza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huell v. Smith
as 1:2011cv02089
Plaintiff:
Clarence Huell
Defendant:
Walter E Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. United States of America et al
as 9:2010cv02640
Plaintiff:
George L Smith and Shirley E Smith
Defendant:
United States of America and Department of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Hunt et al
as 2:2008cv02068
Plaintiff:
Gene E Smith, Sr
Defendant:
Roger L Hunt, James C Mahan, Lawrence R Leavitt and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith et al v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 8:2007cv01101
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Smith and Mary E Smith
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Parker v. Beaufort County Sheriff's Department, The et al
as 4:2007cv00037
Plaintiff:
Monroe R Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Beaufort County Sheriff's Department, The, Beaufort County Sheriff's Department, The, State of South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
