Cases 11 - 20 of 149
SCOTT v. THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, BARRY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, II v. Salamon et al
as 1:2022cv00096
Petitioner:
Earnest Lee Jones, II
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Salamon and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. DOE et al
as 3:2021cv00194
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
NURSE JOHN DOE, MICHEAL P. RADAKER and CORRECT CARE SOLUTION (CCS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SCOTT v. MOONEY et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
CAPTAIN RICHARD A. MOONEY, CAPTAIN LEWIS, C/O1 P.H. BLOOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PITTMAN, v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02230
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
EARNEST PITTMAN,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. DEPUTY CLOSE et al
as 3:2021cv00046
Defendant:
C/O 1 GONDEK, NURSE MICHAEL P RADAKER, DEPUTY CLOSE and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Walker v. Bell et al
as 3:2019cv01297
Defendant:
Russella Jo. Bell, Craig Northrop, D. Earnest and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLEVINS et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02758
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
WRETHA BLEVINS and EARNEST BLEVINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
