Cases 11 - 20 of 76
Young v. Holder
as 4:2013cv00966
Plaintiff:
Bill Clinton Young and And the People
Defendant:
Eric Holder, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lindsey v. Holder et al
as 4:2013cv00557
Plaintiff:
Charles Lindsey
Defendant:
Eric Holder and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Mackovich v. Richardson et al
as 6:2013cv03127
Petitioner:
John Vincent Mackovich
Respondent:
Richardson, Eric Holder and Federal Bureau of Prisons Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Griffin v. Sanders et al
as 6:2013cv03050
Petitioner:
Eric Griffin
Respondent:
Linda Sanders , Eric Holder and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mackovich v. Holder et al
as 6:2012cv03489
Plaintiff:
John Vincent Mackovich
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Harley Lappin, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Foy v. Holder et al
as 6:2012cv03463
Petitioner:
Joaquin Irwin Foy
Respondent:
Eric Holder , Barack Obama , U.S. Government and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jamal et al v. Holder et al
as 4:2012cv01251
Plaintiff:
Syed Jamal , Zaynaub Jahan Chaudhary , Taseen Syed Jamal and others
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton, John Morten and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv01222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Younas v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2012cv01696
Plaintiff:
Tahir Younas
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, David Douglas, Chester Moyer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ives v. Holder
as 6:2012cv03398
Petitioner:
Louis J Ives
Respondent:
Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
