Cases 11 - 20 of 85
Grant, James v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2020cv00712
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Milwaukee County Police Department, Milwaukee County District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
James Edward Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant, James v. Schimd, Scott et al
as 3:2020cv00656
Plaintiff:
James Edward Grant
Defendant:
Apex Investment Group VII, LLC, Scott Schimd and Apex Property Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PATTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv62925
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD GRANT PATTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv38470
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD GRANT PATTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOTELO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv66855
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD GRANT SOTELO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grant v. Roger Searle Penske et al
as 1:2020cv01206
Plaintiff:
Edward Grant
Defendant:
Roger Searle Penske and Penske Trucking Leasing Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRANT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv27669
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TROY EDWARD GRANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grant, James v. Aramark Uniforms
as 3:2020cv00161
Defendant:
Aramark Uniforms
Plaintiff:
James Edward Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05463
Plaintiff:
Edward Grant
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Ethicon Inc, C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grant v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00508
Plaintiff:
Edward Grant
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Ethicon, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
