Cases 11 - 20 of 22
RUNYON v. KRUEGER et al
as 1:2017cv04277
Defendant:
BRAZZELL, JOHN EDWARDS, FBI AGENT and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID RUNYON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. FBI
as 2:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson
Defendant:
FBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SWALLERS (OF THE HOUSE OF) v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016mc00067
Defendant:
THOMAS J. ARVIN, TIM A. BAKER, IN FBI and others
Petitioner:
BRENT ALLEN SWALLERS (OF THE HOUSE OF)
TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv00481
Defendant:
JENNIFER COFFMAN, FBI OFFICE, SECRET SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
STACY TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JACKSON v. INDIANAPOLIS FBI AGENTS et al
as 1:2014cv00473
Defendant:
CHICAGO FBI AGENTS, INDIANAPOLIS FBI AGENTS and MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
YOUNG v. FBI et al
as 1:2013cv01057
Defendant:
FBI and UNITED STATES
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Leslie v. Agents of the Government et al
as 4:2013cv00042
Plaintiff:
Rick DeWayne Leslie
Defendant:
Agents of the Government, Lafayette Police Department, Tippecanoe County Sheriffs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BILLINGS v. FBI DEPARTMENT DIVISION
as 1:2012cv01196
Plaintiff:
EDDIE HAROLD BILLINGS, Jr.
Defendant:
FBI DEPARTMENT DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seamster v. US Department of Justice et al
as 2:2011cv00371
Plaintiff:
Deborah R Seamster
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, US Secret Service and FBI Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. KIELY et al
as 3:2011cv00013
Defendant:
DEPUTY MATT F. KEPPLER, FBI AGENT BRIAN FLAHERTY, FORMER CONGRESSMAN BRAD ELLSWORTH and others
Plaintiff:
JESHA DONALDSON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
