Cases 11 - 20 of 405
Miguel Arias v. Warden FCI Williamsburg
as 22-6836
Petitioner / Appellant:
MIGUEL DE PAULA ARIAS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG
GUILFORD v. FCI WILLIAMSBURG et al
as 2:2022cv01945
Plaintiff:
VALDO GUILFORD
Defendant:
FCI WILLIAMSBURG and FDC PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capalbo v. FCI Williamsburg
as 1:2022cv01011
Petitioner:
Jamie Capalbo and Jamie Neil Capalbo
Respondent:
Warden FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reed v. Warden of FCI Williamsburg
as 5:2022cv00868
Petitioner:
Nathan Reed and Nathan Carl Reed
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Delaney v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00712
Petitioner:
Reginald Delaney and Reginald Keith Delaney
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nettles v. FCI Williamsburg
as 4:2022cv00671
Petitioner:
Demajor Alexander Nettles
Respondent:
Warden FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Regassa v. Dunbar et al
as 8:2022cv00466
Petitioner:
Admassu Regassa
Respondent:
Warden R.S. Dunbar, AWR Wilson, Ms. B. White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anthony Andrews v. Bryan Dobbs
as 22-6018
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY ANDREWS
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN K. DOBBS, Warden FCI Williamsburg
Kevin Bullock v. A. Mendoza
as 21-7762
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN ELWOOD BULLOCK
Respondent / Appellee:
A. MENDOZA, Acting Warden and FCI WILLIAMSBURG
Crocco v. FCI Williamsburg, Warden
as 1:2021cv01078
Petitioner:
Joseph Crocco
Respondent:
FCI Williamsburg, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
