Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Mendez v. FMC Rochester, Minnesota et al
as 0:2020cv01979
Defendant:
FMC Rochester, Minnesota, Warden Steve Kallis, A female Correctional SiS employ and others
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Mendez v. FMC Rochester et al
as 0:2020cv01717
Defendant:
Mr. Beadling, FMC Rochester, Steve Kallis and others
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Mendez v. FMC Rochester et al
as 0:2020cv01640
Defendant:
Doctor Morgan, Dr. Hadaway, T. Asberry and others
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durham v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2020cv01250
Defendant:
Andrew Schumacher, John and Jane Does, John R. Becker and others
Plaintiff:
Hal Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. FMC Rochester et al
as 0:2020cv00247
Defendant:
FMC Rochester, John & Jane Does # 1-10, Machutt and others
Plaintiff:
Barry L. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carlos Almeda v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 19-11326
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN S. SPAULDING, Warden, FMC Devens, J. CAPPS, STEVEN VALLIS, Warden, FMC Rochester and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS ALMEDA, JR. and CARLOS ALMEDA
Jeremy Vaughn Pinson v. Warden, FMC Rochester
as 19-3204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden, FMC Rochester
Raphael Mendez v. David Paul, Warden, et al
as 19-2935
Defendant / Appellee:
David Paul, Warden and Entire Mail Room Staffing, FMC Rochester, Minnesota, et al.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Abdul-Aziz Muhammad v. David Paul
as 19-2811
Respondent / Appellee:
David Paul, Warden Federal Medical Center (FMC Rochester)
Petitioner / Appellant:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad, also known as William Anthony Brown
Scher v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2019cv02001
Defendant:
Capt. J. Feda, Bureau of Prisons, FMC Rochester and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Scher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
